For the most part, the basketball community felt a huge sigh
of relief when the
lockout was lifted. But did that
spell the end of the turmoil among Commissioner David Stern, the players, and
the owners? We should have known better. We should have predicted that, after months of
several heated discussions, that rifts would be permanently created and grudges would be
held. After both sides made considerable
compromises to end the lockout, promises were made to both the players and
owners that efforts would be made to ensure their needs would be met. So after all this, what’s the outcome? For one, every team transaction, from here on
out, will be further scrutinized by everyone in the league. Now, the same day the lockout ended, we’ve already
seen how ugly things have become with the chaotic Chris Paul trade fiasco. In the end, the NBA has seriously tarnished
its brand, and things seem to quickly be spiraling out of control.
Let's hope the league wises up and allows CP3 and Kobe to become teammates |
The unfathomable veto of the trade that would have brought
Chris Paul to the Lakers is the latest episode in what’s been a devastating
blow to the NBA’s image. Owners were
furious that yet another star player would be moving to a premier
franchise. And from my understanding, it
wasn’t JUST the acquiring of Chris Paul alone that prompted the owners to react;
rumors swirled that the Lakers still had a chance to acquire Dwight Howard from
the Magic. While it may not have been feasible
immediately after the Lakers parted with both Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom to get
Paul, owners were still weary that Howard might eventually finagle his way to
LA – especially if he’s not traded to another team.
Scola (left) and Gasol (right) would provide offensive firepower to their respective teams' front lines |
What kills me is that this trade was said to be vetoed for "basketball-related" reasons. Are you kidding me? From a basketball perspective, it's fair to say that New Orleans may have fared the best of the three teams from doing this trade. Lamar Odom, Luis Scola, and Emeka Okafor together would have formed a playoff team-quality front court for the Hornets. That's before even mentioning the acquisition of Kevin Martin and Goran Dragic - who are both up-and-coming prolific scorers (if you don't know Dragic, check out this 23-point 4th quarter outburst he threw down on a very good San Antonio team in the 2010 Western Conference Semis). From a marketing perspective, you obviously can't replace CP3 - even with these high quality players. But it baffles me that the league doesn't realize that this is a much better option than letting Paul walk at season's end, and thereby giving New Orleans nothing in return.
This isn't a bad trade for the other two involved teams, either. In the aftermath of losing Yao Ming, Houston would have landed the second-best big man in the league in Pau Gasol - and were already in the running to land Nene. And of course, Kobe and CP3 would form the best back court in the NBA for the Lakers - albeit with a thin front line. So how the hell is NOT doing this trade better for all three teams from a basketball perspective?
Clearly, there are lingering issues resulting from egos of owners and players in the aftermath of the lockout. So who's at fault for keeping this going?
By opposing the trade of CP3 to LA, Cavs owner Dan Gilbert is showing that he's obviously not over the loss of LeBron James |
To owners, the new CBA should have further prevented teams
from stacking up the league’s best players; ever since LeBron, D-Wade and Bosh joined
forces in Miami last offseason, owners became determined to not allow something
like that to happen again. Thus, when
the very first news they hear (on the SAME DAY the lockout ends, to boot) is
the rumors of CP3 and Dwight Howard both going to the Lakers, their natural
reaction is to push back. They were
promised competitive balance, and felt they were lied to. I think all basketball minds agree that New
Orleans, in the proposed trade, got a pretty damn good deal out of it. But if we’ve learned anything this offseason,
it’s that most owners don’t see things from a basketball perspective – only money.
At the same time, you can’t blame players for wanting to
play for bigger market teams. To CP3, his
desire to achieve long-term security (by signing an extension with the Lakers)
has been denied. If he blows out his
knee this season, he’s screwed. There’s
no denying he has a right to be livid at the league. Smaller market teams want more than 1% chance
of landing star players to improve their venue, but other than a few exceptions
– Reggie Miller with the Pacers, Tim Duncan with the Spurs, and Kevin Durant
with the Thunder – star players prefer bigger markets. That’s never going to change, and owners need
to come to terms with that.
Things will only get uglier from here on out. We’re being told that this happened ONLY because
the NBA currently owns the Hornets, causing a perfect storm for this debauchery
to happen. But hence forth, every
blockbuster trade - especially between big and small-market teams – is going to
be heavily scrutinized. Even the New
Jersey Nets, who are widely anticipated to be considered a bigger market when
they move to Brooklyn next season, got in trouble for tampering in their ongoing
attempts to trade for Dwight Howard. Howard, who is open to the idea of playing with All-Star guard Deron Williams, now has more political obstacles to overcome.
It's not just the NBA-owned Hornets whose trade discussions are under scrutiny; the growing chaos has hindered trade talks involving Dwight Howard (left) and Brook Lopez (right) |
What
a mess.
So who is to blame for the NBA’s image spiraling out of
control?
The easy scapegoat, of course, is David Stern. He’s the one who allowed the lockout get to
the point where it did. He’s the one who’s
been really wishy-washy on why he vetoed the trade. He’s the one hiding from all the heavy
criticism. But remember that ultimately,
Stern answers to the owners; the only reason he’s employed is because of the
owners. He claims all of his decisions
are not affiliated with any pressure he gets from owners, but IMO, that’s not plausible.
David Stern has long ago worn out his welcome |
All things considered, he really needs to retire. He’s gotta go. The NBA badly needs new leadership. Regardless of whether he’s truly at fault, we
know Stern’s reputation is now irreparable, and that he shouldn’t linger around
any longer trying to salvage it.
Besides, he wouldn’t be the only sports figure failing to go out on a
high note; just two months ago, we saw Penn State legend Joe Paterno’s last
season marred by the Jerry Sandusky scandal.
But unlike Paterno, Stern’s leadership has been far from flawless up to
this point. In fact, you can question
the very beginning of his reign upon the first NBA draft lottery in 1985: many conspiracies are out there giving solid
evidence that Stern “aided” the New York Knicks to win the draft lottery – and
of course allowing them to land #1 pick Patrick Ewing. Of course, the infamous Tim
Donaghy scandal comes to mind as well, which put the entire integrity of
the game into question. Fair or not,
Stern’s legacy will always be associated with these conspiracies.
It's tough to imagine either Greg Oden or Brandon Roy ever setting foot on an NBA court again |
The growing rift between the owners and players is not the
only sad story to surface before this already-shortened season even
started. Portland Trailblazers star
Brandon Roy, who could no longer avoid the inevitable, called
it quits on account of his gimpy knees.
We saw flashes of the great player he could have been in Game 4 of last
year’s First Round matchup vs. the eventual NBA Champion Dallas Mavericks, and it appears that's the last of him. Things are also looking pretty glum for his
teammate Greg Oden, who is continuing to struggle making his way back on the
court after a heavily injury-ridden start to his career. So on the Blazers front, the already-sad
story is only getting sadder.
Somehow, even after the labor situation resolved itself, the
NBA is looking worse and worse. All we
can hope for now is for the chaos to subside, and that things start looking up
once the actual basketball gets underway.
Until then, the bleeding won’t stop and the growing divide between players, owners, and the commissioner will not be set aside.
No comments:
Post a Comment